Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(5): 441-447, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2294399

ABSTRACT

Importance: New-onset retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) occurring acutely after messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination has been described in recent literature. Because RVO can cause vision loss or blindness, an epidemiologic investigation evaluating this potential association is of great importance to public health. Objective: To investigate how often patients are diagnosed with new RVO acutely after the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine compared with influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective population-based cohort design using the TriNetX Analytics platform, a federated, aggregated electronic health record (EHR) research network containing the deidentified EHR data of more than 103 million patients, was used to examine aggregate EHR data. Data were collected and analyzed on October 20, 2022. Data on patients within the TriNetX Analytics platform were searched for the presence of vaccination Common Procedural Technology codes, and instances of newly diagnosed RVO within 21 days of vaccination were recorded and reported. Propensity score matching based on demographic characteristics (age, sex, race and ethnicity) and comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) was performed between vaccination groups for evaluation of relative risks (RRs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The appearance of a new-encounter diagnosis of RVO within 21 days of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was the primary outcome. Historical comparison cohorts of patients receiving influenza and Tdap vaccinations allowed for evaluation of the RRs for RVO. Results: Of 3 108 829 patients (mean [SD] age at vaccination, 50.7 [20.4] years; 56.4% women) who received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, 104 (0.003%; 95% CI, 0.003%-0.004%) patients had a new diagnosis of RVO within 21 days of vaccination. After propensity score matching, the RR for new RVO diagnosis after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccination was not significantly different from that after influenza (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.01) or Tdap (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.44-1.38) vaccinations, but was greater when compared with the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.33-3.81). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that RVO diagnosed acutely after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination occurs extremely rarely at rates similar to those of 2 different historically used vaccinations, the influenza and Tdap vaccines. No evidence suggesting an association between the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and newly diagnosed RVO was found.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Diphtheria , Emblems and Insignia , Influenza, Human , Tetanus , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Electronic Health Records , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Tetanus/immunology , Tetanus/prevention & control , Diphtheria/immunology , Diphtheria/prevention & control
2.
Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother ; 40(2): 36-49, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1201076

ABSTRACT

The dawn of the 20th century saw the formative years of developments in immunology. In particular, immunochemistry, specifically pertaining to antibodies, was extensively studied. These studies laid the foundations for employing antibodies in a variety of ways. Not surprisingly, antibodies have been used for applications ranging from biomedical research to disease diagnostics and therapeutics to evaluation of immune responses during natural infection and those elicited by vaccines. Despite recent advancements in cellular immunology and the excitement of T cell therapy, use of antibodies represents a large proportion of immunotherapeutic approaches as well as clinical interventions. Polyclonal antibodies in the form of plasma or sera continue to be used to treat a number of diseases, including autoimmune disorders, cancers, and infectious diseases. Historically, antisera to toxins have been the longest serving biotherapeutics. In addition, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) have been extensively used to treat not only immunodeficiency conditions but also autoimmune disorders. Beyond the simplistic suppositions of their action, the IVIg have also unraveled the immune regulatory and homeostatic ramifications of their use. The advent of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), on the other hand, has provided a clear pathway for their development as drug molecules. MAbs have found a clear place in the treatment of cancers and extending lives and have been used in a variety of other conditions. In this review, we capture the important developments in the therapeutic applications of antibodies to alleviate disease, with a focus on some of the recent developments.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Diphtheria/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Diphtheria/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulins/immunology , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL